Before we head off on vacation, I just wanted to share an interesting bit of news with you that you may find fascinating. While the global stock markets may be off to one of their rockiest starts in recent history, its nice to see that it hasn’t had a material impact on certain segments of the collectible industry, particularly highly desirable diecast items. Take, for instance, the Dragon Cyber Hobby Otto Carius Tiger tank that is packed in a metal tin with a collector card (DRR60120) and is no longer available through normal sales channels. Released way back in 2004 for a paltry $49.99, this item has steadily risen in value, far exceeding all expectations even we placed on this item when we started to hike its asking price. Recently on eBay, an example of this item, admittedly with the now deceased panzer ace’s signature emblazoned on the packaging, fetched a whopping $700 overseas, or more precisely 14 times what it originally sold for in just eleven years. Not bad when things seem topsy turvy on the financial scene…
Whispers
Happy New Year from The Motor Pool
The Arsenal of Democracy: Chrysler Chronicles its Role in WWII
Chrysler’s role as a tank manufacturer during World War II is chronicled in a new, six-minute documentary featuring its role as a supplier of military weapons to Europe during the war.
The release of “Automakers and the Arsenal of Democracy” was timed to coincide with the 75th anniversary of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s historic “Arsenal of Democracy” radio broadcast on Dec. 29, 1940.
“The people of Europe …do not ask us to do their fighting,” Roosevelt told the nation on that day. “They ask us for the implements of war…which will enable them to fight for their liberty and for our security.” (courtesy Detroit Free Press)
“Pilots, Check Your Six-th”
While drones seem to have taken center stage over the past few years, two prime aircraft manufacturers have unveiled concept artwork showing their respective versions of a sixth generation manned fighter. Both employ stealthy characteristics, looking more like scaled down versions of a B-2 Spirit bomber than a true dogfighter. However, that’s where the similarities end, since both are expected to offer supercruise capability, carry large internal weapons bays toting a wide array of ordnance, be able to fly for long distances, and, most importantly, be armed with a laser cannon to ward off close range targets.
Both concepts feature a tailless design, twin engines and are oversized in comparison to previous fighters if they are to meet all of the Pentagon’s design requirements, and provide heat dissipation solutions to cool off the engines, power plant and laser cannons. Its unclear if the USMC will be equipped with a sixth generation fighter due to their need for a VTOL flight profile. The Northrop design is shown atop while the competing Lockheed Martin effort is shown below it. Interestingly, the Lockheed-Martin illustration seems to show two men in the cockpit, perhaps one controlling the myriad weapons systems and defensive components while the pilot flies the plane.
Boeing’s concept for their FA-XX sixth generation fighter is a bit different than the previous two entrants, sporting a canard wing for added stability in-flight. The Navy version will likely feature strengthened undercarriages for carrier operations and will likely come with folding wing tips for stowage, particularly if they are much larger than the legacy aircraft they are being designed to replace.
The LRS-B: And the Winner is…
Northrop Grumman. So says Defense Secretary Ash Carter and the Air Force leadership on Tuesday night, which is expected to top $55 billion over the life of the program. According to Defense News, “Northrop now has the Pentagon’s blessing to build a new fleet of aircraft to replace the Air Force’s aging B-52s and B-1s. As builder of the B-2 stealth bomber, Northrop beat out a joint Lockheed Martin-Boeing team in a closely watched competition that has lasted months longer than anticipated.”
The Long Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B) will undoubtedly incorporate stealthy characteristics, much like the B-2 Spirit bomber it will eventually replace, yet cost substantially less per plane. “LRS-B’s projected unit cost is higher compared to the B-1, but significantly lower relative to the $1.5 billion price tag of Northrop’s B-2, according to an Air Force handout. The expected development cost overall for LRS-B is also lower than for the B-2, at $23.5 billion,” according to Defense News.
Thus far the new plane has yet to be revealed to the public, even though Northrop Grumman unveiled a brand new web site touting the aircraft within hours after being awarded the contract. By choosing the Northrop-Grumman design over the one espoused by the Boeing-Lockheed-Martin team, the DoD maintains the traditional selection process fostered by the military-industrial complex, and likely keeps Northrop-Grumman afloat who might very well have had to look for a suitor to take over its flagging business should it have lost the contract.
BAe Rounds Out the Tanker’s Vision
Borrowing technology used for situational awareness on jet fighters, BAE Systems has unveiled technology that allows vehicle crews to “see through” their vehicles for 360-degree vision.
BattleView 360 is essentially “a digital mapping system that collates, displays, and tracks the positions of all surrounding features of interest in two- or three-dimensional modes,” said a BAE news release.
Among its features are a head-worn component that can be synced to vehicle cameras in both visual and infrared. Dismounted soldiers can also wear to relay information back to the vehicle.
Hammer’s Slammers comes of age…
- courtesy C4ISR&Networks
The Kaga: Raised from the Dead
It is not uncommon for a warship’s name to be used over and over again across the lifespan of several ships. In the case of the Enterprise, the US Navy has re-purposed the name for seven different warships, going as far back as 1799. It even serves as the basis for an entire science fiction series should the name soldier on into the future.
For the Japanese Navy, the Kaga has equally special meaning, since it was one of the aircraft carriers that launched a surprise attack at Pearl Harbor in December 1941 and was subsequently sunk at the Battle of Midway some six months later. Now some seventy odd years later, the Kaga sails again, this time around serving as a 24-000 ton helicopter assault ship (DDH-184). According to USNI News, “The ship follows JS Izumo (DDH-183) which entered service in the Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force (JMSDF) in March.”
While the ship is designed for anti-submarine warfare (ASW) and could render humanitarian relief to stricken areas, the ship can quickly be converted for offensive purposes should the Japanese decide to purchase the short takeoff US F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which can operate off of a helicopter assault ship. Likewise it can also handle the US V-22 Osprey, which has a much further range and greater carrying capacity than any of the helicopters intended to operate from the Kaga.
Somehow, all of this serves as a strange twist of fate for a ship that helped to start hostilities between the Empire of Japan and the United States over seven decades ago. Godspeed Kaga.
The Pentagon’s “Pacific Pivot” Picks Up Speed
In line with the so-called “Pacific Pivot” espoused by Pentagon planners who foresee a possible war in and along the Pacific Rim, the military has requested plans for a new family of military landing craft to be used by both the US Army and US Navy for water borne delivery of heavy assets. According to Defence News, the new Maneuver Support Vessel (Light), or MSV(L), will be required to transport either one M1 Abrams main battle tank, two Stryker infantry combat vehicles or up to four Joint Light Tactical Vehicles. The MSV would replace the current fleet of aging Landing Craft Mechanized that are still in service with both branches of the military.
“The Army plans to issue a request for proposals before the end of the year, make an award later in 2016, have a prototype in 2017, and be testing in 2018 and 2019,” says Defence News. “A 10-year indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract would cover three years of engineering and manufacturing development, two years of low rate initial production and five years of full production.”
Separately, the Pentagon cancelled a new amphibious assault vehicle a couple of years ago that was aimed at replacing the fleet of aging Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicles (AAVPs) currently in US service. At the time, the Pentagon claimed there was no need to make a “forcible entry” onto a well-defended beach since the Marines and US Army haven’t had to wage an assault from the sea in over 60 years. Updates to a number of aging weapons platforms are currently underway across the entire spectrum of military vehicles, and with a potential conflict looming against certain East Asian countries, it remains to be seen if the Pentagon decides to re-open the matter and follow-up on a potential beach invasion candidate.
The Successor to the Vanguard is, well, the Successor
Ordinarily, new weapons programs are steeped in secrecy and receive their names in accordance with mythical creatures, fabled leaders, landmarks, and even symbolism. In the case of Britain’s newest ballistic missile carrying submarine, someone came up with the idea to name it Successor, which is aimed to carry on the forty year-old tradition of having a nuclear deterrence sailing beneath the ocean’s waves.
According to UK Defence Journal, the Successor will be massive in size, so much so that Vickers Shipbuilding and Engineering Limited at Barrow-in-Furness, the shipyard tasked with building the trio of submarines, must itself undergo a refit and refurbishment this fall so it can set about the job of building the mighty under sea warrior. Britain’s requirement is to have the first Successor put to sea by 2021, which is five years beyond the current service life of the Vanguard class of missile submarines. As a stop gap measure, the four Vanguard class submarines will have to be updated and retrofitted, thereby enabling them to remain seaworthy until the Successor comes on line.
“While details remain sketchy at best regarding the currently titled ‘Successor class’, one of the key features the new boats will have is a Common Missile Compartment (CMC),” says UK Defence Journal. “CMC aims to define the missile tubes and accompanying systems that would be used to launch new ballistic missiles, successors to the current Trident II/ D5 missile fleet used by the USA and Britain.”
The Successor program is vital to the UK’s thermonuclear intercontinental ballistic missile strategy, since it is the only remaining tip of the triad strategy that can still offer a nuclear deterrence. “Since the retirement of the last Royal Air Force free falling nuclear bomb in 1998,” says UK Defence Journal, “the British nuclear deterrent has been entirely submarine based. This is intended to deter a potential enemy because they cannot eliminate our ability to strike back in a first strike if a missile submarine remains at sea.” The UK does not possess a land-based nuclear missile program like its compatriot the United States.
Disney Unveils a Galaxy, Far, Far Away
Looks like the Mrs. and I have a date with destiny in a few years when we take our grand kids down to Orlando, Florida. At the recently concluded Disney Expo, held in Anaheim, California, Disney Chairman, Robert Eiger, disclosed information concerning their latest theme parks. Dubbed Star Wars Land, at least for now, the new 14-acre theme park to be added to both the Disney Land property in Anaheim as well as the Disney World mega complex in Florida, will be the mecca for all things Star Wars-related, featuring rides, attractions, stores and other venues all tied together within a “space port” like cityscape. Employees dressed in Star Wars costumes will circulate among the park’s visitors, appear in make-shift bands (think the Star Wars cantina scene), and engage in light saber battles, all in an effort to breathe life into the Star Wars saga we’ve all come to know and love. No word as yet as to when the theme parks will be completed, but you can bet Disney will be throwing lots of money at these twin projects as more and more movies, games and merchandise come to the fore.
Meanwhile, other previously constructed venues will be updated accordingly, including Star Tours, while a few existing attractions, namely Space Mountain, will be renamed Hyper Space Mountain, and be spruced up to give it a more Star Wars-esque appearance. No word if a Star Wars-themed Hotel(s) will be erected for park goers, but we’re willing to bet that one or perhaps several are being discussed with the hospitality industry.